Indian Journal of Endocrine Surgery and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles


Role of Ultrasound in Pretreatment Evaluation of Lymph Node Status in Carcinoma Breast: A Systematic Review

Anshika Arora

Keywords : Axilla, Breast neoplasm, Lymph node metastasis, Sensitivity, Specificity, Systematic review, Ultrasonography

Citation Information : Arora A. Role of Ultrasound in Pretreatment Evaluation of Lymph Node Status in Carcinoma Breast: A Systematic Review. 2021; 16 (2):101-107.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10088-11176

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-02-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; The Author(s).


Aim: This systematic review aimed to analyze efficacy of axillary ultrasonography (USG) in differentiating normal from abnormal lymph nodes (LNs) in breast cancer patients, taking into account the different criteria used. Background: Identification of pretreatment axillary LN metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer, and it affects the surgical plan and oncological management after surgery. Review results: A PubMed search was made using the following items: “Ultrasonography” [Mesh] AND “Axilla” [Mesh] AND “Breast Neoplasms” [Mesh]. A total of 34 studies were included in the review analysis. Studies were divided according to the LN feature studied into six subheadings which include size, cortex thickness, hilum changes, long axis-to-short axis ratio (L/S ratio), combination of multiple morphological factors, and combination of both morphology and size. For LN size, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 49 to 95%, 34 to 97.4%; cortical thickness 35 to 96%, 36 to 92%; hilar changes 24 to 92%, 23 to 100%; L/S ratio 65 to 100%, 18 to 65%; morphological features 26 to 94%, 76 to 100%; and combination of both morphological and size 18 to 100%, 50 to 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Role of USG in pretreatment axillary staging has been extensively studied. Various diagnostic criteria have been used for defining abnormal LN, which leads to difficult comparisons between various studies. Clinical significance: Pretreatment evaluation of axilla with USG, using multiple criteria, like LN size, L/S ratio, cortical, and hilar abnormalities in combination with morphological features, gave the best accuracy for detection of abnormal nodes and lowest false-negative rates in breast cancer patients.

  1. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 2008;299(18):2151–2163. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.
  2. Moffat Jr FL, Senofsky GM, Davis K, et al. Axillary node dissection for early breast cancer: some is good, but all is better. J Surg Oncol 1992;51(1):8−13. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930510105.
  3. Reintgen D, Giuliano R, Cox CE. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: an overview. Breast J 2000;6(5):299–305. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2000.20057.x.
  4. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2017;318(10):918–926. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
  5. Cox CE, Pendas S, Cox JM, et al. Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg 1998;227:645–651. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00005.
  6. Genta F, Zanon E, Camanni M, et al. Cost/accuracy ratio analysis in breast cancer patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology, sentinel node biopsy, and frozen section of node. World J Surg 2007;31(6):1155–1163. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9009-3.
  7. Bruneton JN, Caramella E, Héry M, et al. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with US. Radiology 1986;158(2):325–326. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510440.
  8. Tate JJ, Lewis V, Archer T, et al. Ultrasound detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1989;15(2):139–141. PMID: 2649395.
  9. Vaidya JS, Vyas JJ, Thakur MH, et al. Role of ultrasonography to detect axillary node involvement in operable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22(2):140–143. DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(96)90593-4.
  10. Bonnema J, van Geel AN, van Ooijen B, et al. Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy for detection of nonpalpable axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients: new diagnostic method. World J Surg 1997;21(3):270–274. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900227.
  11. Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, et al. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(8):1068–1073. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00748-7.
  12. Choi YJ, Ko EY, Han BK, et al. High-resolution ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Breast 2009;18(2):119–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.004.
  13. Kapila K, Alath P, Hebbar GH, et al. Correlation of ultrasound findings and fine needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2019;63(1):17–22. DOI: 10.1159/000493635.
  14. Choudhary J, Agrawal R, Mishra A, et al. Ultrasound and color Doppler evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma with histopathological correlation. Int J Sci Stud 2018;5(10):59–66. DOI: 10.17354/ijss/2018/13.
  15. van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, et al. Ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(1):31–35. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.01.024.
  16. Oz A, Demirkazik FB, Akpinar MG, et al. Efficiency of ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer 2012;15(2):211–217. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.2.211.
  17. Stachs A, Thi AT, Dieterich M, et al. Assessment of ultrasound features predicting axillary nodal metastasis in breast cancer: the impact of cortical thickness. Ultrasound Int Open 2015;1(1):E19–E24. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1555872.
  18. Lee B, Lim AK, Krell J, et al. The efficacy of axillary ultrasound in the detection of nodal metastasis in breast cancer. AJR 2013;200(3):W314–W320. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9032.
  19. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, et al. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy–clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology 2009;250(1):41–49. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493071483.
  20. Bedi DG, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Cortical morphologic features of axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of metastasis in breast cancer: in vitro sonographic study. AJR 2008;191(3):646–652. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2460.
  21. Lam WW, Yang WT, Chan YL, et al. Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma by technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy, ultrasound and conventional mammography. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23(5):498–503. DOI: 10.1007/BF00833382.
  22. Yang WT, Ahuja A, Tang A, et al. High resolution sonographic detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 1996;16:241–246 [Erratum in: J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:644]. DOI: 10.7863/jum.1996.15.3.241.
  23. Yang WT, Metreweli C. Colour Doppler flow in normal axillary lymph nodes. Br J Radiol 1998;71(844):381–383. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659130.
  24. Sapino A, Cassoni P, Zanon E, et al. Ultrasonographically-guided fine needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes: role in breast cancer management. Br J Cancer 2003;88(5):702–706. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600744.
  25. Bedrosian I, Bedi D, Kuerer HM, et al. Impact of clinicopathological factors on sensitivity of axillary ultrasonography in the detection of axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10(9):1025–1030. DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.12.017.
  26. Mobbs LM, Jannicky EAS, Weaver DL, et al. The accuracy of sonography in detecting abnormal axillary lymph nodes when breast cancer is present. J Diagn Med Sonogr 2005;21(4):297–303. DOI: 10.1177/8756479305278268.
  27. Nathanson SD, Burke M, Slater R, et al. Preoperative identification of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14(11):3102–3110. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9494-5.
  28. Mainiero MB, Cinelli CM, Koelliker SL, et al. Axillary ultrasound and fine needle aspiration in the preoperative evaluation of the breast cancer patient: an algorithm based on tumor size and lymph node appearance. AJR 2010;195(5):1261–1267. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4414.
  29. Torres Sousa MY, BanegasIllescas ME, Rozas Rodríguez ML, et al. Preoperative staging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: ultrasonographic parameters and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Radiología 2011;53(6):544–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2010.12.007.
  30. Park SH, Kim MJ, Park BW, et al. Impact of preoperative ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes on surgical management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18(3):738–744. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1347-y.
  31. Valente SA, Levine GM, Silverstein MJ, et al. Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(6):1825–1830. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2200-7.
  32. Farrell TP, Adams NC, Stenson M, et al. The Z0011 Trial: Is this the end of axillary ultrasound in the pre-operative assessment of breast cancer patients? Eur Radiol 2015;25(9):2682–2687. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3683-6.
  33. Dihge L, Grabau DA, Rasmussen RW, et al. The accuracy of preoperative axillary nodal staging in primary breast cancer by ultrasound is modified by nodal metastatic load and tumor biology. Acta Oncol 2016;55(8):976–982. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2016. 1146826.
  34. Oruwari JU, Chung MA, Koelliker S, et al. Axillary staging using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Surg 2002;184(4):307–309. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00957-1.
  35. Damera A, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, et al. Diagnosis of axillary nodal metastases by ultrasound-guided core biopsy in primary operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89(7):1310–1313. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601290.
  36. Shetty MK, Carpenter WS. Sonographic evaluation of isolated abnormal axillary lymph nodes identified on mammograms. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23(1):63–71. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.1.63.
  37. ÇaliŞkan KC, Yetkin G, Çelebi S, et al. The role of pre-operative b mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the axillary lymph node metastases in the initial staging of breast carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 2005;105(5):511–514. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2005.11679770.
  38. Cowher MS, Erb KM, Poller W, et al. Correlation of the use of axillary ultrasound and lymph node needle biopsy with surgical lymph node pathology in patients with invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 2008;196(5):756–759. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.015.
  39. Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, et al. Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20: 819–827. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2609-7.
  40. Ertan K, Linsler C, di Liberto A, et al. Axillary ultrasound for breast cancer staging: an attempt to identify clinical/histopathological factors impacting diagnostic performance. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2013;7:35–40. DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S11215.
  41. Kaur N, Sharma P, Garg A, et al. Accuracy of individual descriptors and grading of nodal involvement by axillary ultrasound in patients of breast cancer. Int J Breast Cancer 2013;1–6. DOI:10.1155/2013/930596.
  42. Obwegeser R, Lorenz K, Hohlagschwandtner M, et al. Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: is size related to metastatic involvement? World J Surg 2000;24(5):546–550. DOI: 10.1007/s002689910088.
  43. Solbiati L, Cioffi V, Ballarati E. Ultrasonography of the neck. Radial Clin North Am 1992;30:941–954. PMID: 1518938.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.