Indian Journal of Endocrine Surgery and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Review Paper

Analyzing Nipple Discharge: A Surgeon's Perspective

Ganesh Bhat, Rizhin Sooraj, Pooja Ramakant

Keywords : Benign breast disease, Breast lump, Diagnostic evaluation, Duct ectasia, Nipple discharge, Prolactinoma

Citation Information : Bhat G, Sooraj R, Ramakant P. Analyzing Nipple Discharge: A Surgeon's Perspective. 2022; 17 (2):53-60.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10088-11199

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: This review article aims to provide a bird's-eye view for a surgeon dealing with a patient with Nipple discharge (ND). Background: Nipple discharge is the third most common complaint of a woman visiting a breast clinic. It can be physiological, due to benign disorders like duct ectasia or can be a presenting symptom of breast cancer. Hence, it is extremely important to evaluate every patient with ND thoroughly with robust history and clinical examination followed by necessary investigations like ultrasonography and mammography (MMG). Review results: Ultrasonography and MMG are the mainstays in the evaluation of ND. The role of magnetic resonance imaging, ductography, ductoscopy, and nipple aspiration cytology is not very well-defined and is evolving. Nonbreast etiologies of ND also need to be considered and relevant investigations to manage such patients are needed, clues for which lie in the presenting complaints of the patients. Various drugs also interfere with the physiology of breast secretions and are an important cause of ND and need to be managed appropriately. Management of ND should be directed toward the inciting cause of the disease. Surgical options include microdochectomy or a more radical Hadfield's surgery. Conclusion: Directed investigations to determine the etiology of ND guided by clues found during the clinical examination of a patient can help in the appropriate treatment of ND and also avoid unnecessary surgery. Clinical significance: Nipple discharge is one of the most common complaints with which a woman attends a breast clinic and needs to be approached systematically to identify the cause and decide on appropriate management strategies.


PDF Share
  1. Bland KI, Copeland EM, Klimberg VS, et al. In: The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. Fifth, Elsevier; 2017, p. 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01946-6.
  2. Sajadi-Ernazarova KR, Sugumar K, Adigun R. Breast Nipple Discharge. StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, 2022. PMID: 28613688.
  3. Patel BK, Falcon S, Drukteinis J. Management of nipple discharge and the associated imaging findings. Am J Med 2015;128:353–360. PMID: 25447625.
  4. Stafford AP, Cruz LMD La, Willey SC. Workup and treatment of nipple discharge—a practical review. 2021;1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/abs-21-23.
  5. Panzironi G, Pediconi F, Sardanelli F. Nipple discharge: The state of the art. BJR Open 2019;1(1):20180016. DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180016.
  6. Gupta D, Mendelson EB, Karst I. Nipple discharge: Current clinical and imaging evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;330–339. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22025.
  7. Gosi SKY, Garla VV. Galactorrhea. 2022 Aug 22. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. PMID: 30725800.
  8. Kristin S, Rosenfeld JN. Evaluation and treatment of galactorrhea. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1763–1770. PMID: 11352287.
  9. Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Cariaggi P. Significance of nipple discharge clinical patterns in the selection of cases for cytologic examination. Acta Cytol 1986;30:17–20. PMID: 3456180.
  10. Leis H. Management of nipple discharge. World J Surg 1989;13:736–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.06.006.
  11. van Gelder L, Bisschops RH, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral bloody nipple discharge; useful when conventional diagnostics are negative? World J Surg. 2015;39:184–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2701-1.
  12. Sartorius OW, Smith HS, Morris P, et al. Cytologic evaluation of breast fluid in the detection of breast disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1977;59:1073–1080. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/59.4.1073.
  13. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ. Navigating murky waters: A modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 2007;194:854–855. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.027.
  14. Chen L, Zhou WB, Zhao Y, et al. Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;132:9–14. DOI:10.1007/s10549-011-1787-5.
  15. Mansel RE, Webster DJT, Sweetland HM, et al. Hughes, Mansel & Webster's benign disorders and diseases of the breast. In: Edinburgh, UK: Saunders; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-2774-1.X0001-1.
  16. Molitch M. Drugs and prolactin. Pituitary 2008;11(2):209–218. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-008-0106-6.
  17. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(2):273–288. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1692.
  18. Barkan AL, Chandler WF. Giant pituitary prolactinoma with falsely low serum prolactin: The pitfall of the “high-dose hook effect”: Case report. Neurosurgery 1998; 42(4):913–955; discussion 915–916. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199804000-00126.
  19. de Paula IB, Campos AM. Breast imaging in patients with nipple discharge. Radiol Bras 2017;50:383–388. PMID: 29307929.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.