Indian Journal of Endocrine Surgery and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Identification of Challenges Faced by Medical Faculties Trained in Curriculum Implementation Support Program in Implementation of New MBBS Curriculum

Meenakshi Yeola

Keywords : Competency-based medical education, Curriculum implementation support program workshop, Medical curriculum

Citation Information : Yeola M. Identification of Challenges Faced by Medical Faculties Trained in Curriculum Implementation Support Program in Implementation of New MBBS Curriculum. 2022; 17 (1):4-7.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10088-11180

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 28-07-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


We planned to do a study to document the various challenges faced by medical faculties while implementing the new competency-based curriculum for the medical graduates. The study was planned as a survey, and Google form-based questionnaire was sent to all faculties residing in Uttar Pradesh and who had completed curriculum implementation support program (CISP) workshop from King George's Medical College during years 2019–2020. The questions were designed keeping in mind the relevant issues such as time constraints, resources, team work, coordination, financial constraints, feasibility of practically implementing the new curriculum, and how mature are our students in adapting to the new methods of teaching. Many faculty members could not respond to the questionnaire as they were preoccupied with COVID pandemic crisis management. Majority of the faculties found mild to moderate level of difficulty in understanding the new curriculum. There was mixed response in regard to practical implementation of the new curriculum as 44% found moderate level of difficulty and resistance to adapt to the new system. Forty-three percent faced financial constraints in establishing the skills lab. Fifty-nine percent agreed that they had enough teaching learning methods. Majority found limited manpower, lack of enthusiasm, limited time especially in COVID pandemic, and online mode of teaching methods, lack of adequate resources, and difficulty in coordination as the challenging issues in implementation of the new curriculum. The solutions they suggested were to have regular meetings, listen to the problems and work on solutions, periodically motivate the faculties to adapt to the new system, train all faculties in CISP workshop, and to have short-term and long-term goals well defined to track the progress.

PDF Share
  1. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010;32(8):638–645. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.
  2. Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, et al. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med 2011;86(4):460–467. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cb2a7.
  3. Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach 2007;29:648–654. PubMed: 18236251.
  4. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: education outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education [Last accessed on May 16, 2016]. Available from:
  5. Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007;29:642–647. PubMed: 18236250.
  6. Modi JN, Gupta P, Singh T. Competency-based medical education, entrustment and assessment. Indian Pediatr 2015;52(5):413–420. DOI: 10.1007/s13312-015-0647-5.
  7. Ten Cate O. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ 2013;5:157–158. PMCID: PMC3613304.
  8. Ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542–547. PubMed: 17525536.
  9. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, et al. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:103–111. PubMed: 12224871.
  10. Medical Council of India. College and Course search. Available at: [Accessed Apr 15, 2018].
  11. Kaushik A, Jaiswal A, Singh AK, et al. Challenges to new undergraduate medical curriculum due to COVID-19 pandemic and possible solution in India. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2020;15(3):319. DOI: 10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_263_20.
  12. Mahajan R, Badyal DK, Singh T. Online faculty-development programme for medical teachers in resource poor settings: behind the scene. J Res Med Edu Ethics 2017;7(3):163–168. DOI: 10.5958/2231-6728.2017.00028.2.
  13. Medical Council of India. Curriculum Implementation Support Program (CISP I): first year report. 2019. p. 1–49.
  14. Deswal BS, Singhal VK. Problems of medical education in India. Int JCommunity Med Public Health 2016;3:1905–1909. DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20162063.
  15. Rustagi SM, Mohan C, Verma N, et al. Competency-based medical education: the perceptions of faculty. J Med Acad 2019;2(1):1–5 [Page 13/15]. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10070-0034.
  16. Kulkarni P, Pushpalatha K, Bhat D. Medical education in India: past, present, and future. APIK J Int Med 2019;7:69–73. DOI: 10.4103/AJIM.AJIM_13_19.
  17. Caverzagie KJ, Nousiainen MT, Ferguson PC, et al. Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2017;39:588–593. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.